Oftentimes, scratching a nail over polished walnut reveals rot below. This paper will elucidate this subtextual phenomenon, using an anyonymous author/poet whom we'll call, "T. Swift," as example. Let's imagine this invented Swift produces bubblegum pop to make thick-waisted executives foam at the
mouth. Her sugary, overripe declarations of love gained and lost are fodder for
hormone-mad preteens (and their open-wallet parents), yet retain enough
cynicism and musicality to lure adults into a (false) sense of second youth.
Pressing vinyl grooved with Swiftian compositions trails only counterfeiting
Benjamins and cooking meth on the scale of sheer profitability.
T. Swift's narrator is strong-voiced, swoony with love and
oft wronged. Her unapologetic beltings seem a pean to the "girl
power" of the late 90's. However, consuming the whole of Swift's catalogue
in a single sitting with a half-dozen pots of coffee reveals a dark turbulence
below the shiny pop. We glean our thesis from the opening stanza of "I
Knew You Were Trouble" (emphasis mine):
I
guess you didn't care / and I guess I liked that
And when I fell hard / you took a step back
Without me, without me / without me
And when I fell hard / you took a step back
Without me, without me / without me
This innocent-seeming passage highlights our narrator's
agility in sidestepping the truth. Taking a step from the infectious hook, we
realize our narrator has glossed over falling
in love with a man she'd only just met. This avoidance of truth, inconsistency
of voice and anti-empathetic tone occurs again and again in Swiftian work:
Your
guard is up and I know why./Because the last time you saw me/is still burned in
the back of your mind./You gave me roses and I left them there to die. (Back to December)
We were
talking / I didn't say half the things I wanted to. (Hey Stephen)
People
are people, and sometimes we change our minds. (Speak Now)
The pattern holds throughout the Swift catalogue: the
narrator makes declarations then contradicts herself in the next breath. A sociopath,
simply defined, is one who displays extreme, antisocial behavior lacking
conscience. Taken in concert, Swift's body of work reveals a sociopathic liar who takes joy in the manipulation and psychological
abuse of her varied paramours.
Let's look at another example, this time from "We are
Never Getting Back Together." The opening lines mean to frame the
narrator's love interest the archetypal, non-committal male in order to later gain
satisfaction from casting stones. However, a close reading of the text paints a
different picture:
I remember
when we broke up the first time
…'cause like… We hadn't seen each other in a month… Then you come around again and say
"Baby, I miss you" …I say, "I hate you," we break up …
…'cause like… We hadn't seen each other in a month… Then you come around again and say
"Baby, I miss you" …I say, "I hate you," we break up …
Not only is our narrator the antagonist of her own tale, but
she enjoys the sadism found in torturing her desperate lover. Read as such, the
spoken interlude later in the song shrivels male genitals everywhere:
Uggg...
so he calls me up and he's like,
"I
still love you,"
And I'm like... "I just...
And I'm like... "I just...
We are
never getting back together. Like, ever"
Men, as a gender, often stand in the way of their own
emotions. Presented with a man displaying dedication and lack of
self-preservation by declaring love, our narrator simply puts on her
"sexy baby" voice and swats
him away like a fly.
Going back to "Trouble," we can now see the problems
inherent with Swiftian unreliable narration. The chorus gloats again and again to
an ex-lover, "I knew you were trouble when you walked in." However, did
our narrator truly believe their own statements? Perhaps she correctly assed
trouble and intentionally engaged in
relations to fill a masochistic need. Given a bubblegum tessellation on Humbert
Humbert, we should take nothing at face value.
"You Belong With Me," is meant to be an ode to the
one who got away. Unreliable narration makes it the story of a "friend-zoned"
girl trying to infect an imagined paramour with her own virulent unhappiness.
Our narrator intends "Love Story," to be a modern
Romeo and Juliet song:
'Cause
you were Romeo – I was a scarlet letter,
And my daddy said, "Stay away from Juliet."
And my daddy said, "Stay away from Juliet."
The more likely explanation of the text is our narrator's tired
father is trying against all hope to protect oblivious lovers from his succubus
of a daughter.
We must, however, draw an important line, that being the one
separating art from artist. Our author may be in the minority of well-adjusted teen-stars
and merely chooses to write every song in
the voice of a brutal sociopath. Swift shows us again and again; readers,
listeners and viewers must retain a healthy skepticism for the voice of their
narrator.
No comments:
Post a Comment